Avoid "void" Law 46B4 Ordering a card not in dummy. conclusion for 2017

[Petrus Schuster OSB]

... Law 23 to adjust score if the defence is damaged

While I'm sympathetic to this, I don't think it goes far enough. L23
requires that declarer "could have known" and doesn't apply otherwise.
I'd prefer a solution that prevents damage to defenders even when the
damage could not have been predicted. Is this too much sympathy for the
innocent side?

But surely a player "could have known" that many an opponent would
carelessly follow to an invalid play, and that seeing a defender's card
and completely changing the play might damage defenders - even without
penalty card provisions?

_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml